Promoting Health Internationally Essay

Developing countries are beset with wellness crises to a great extent than their to a greater extent than developed counterparts. The lack of resources and the presence of many demanding needs causes the insufficient allocation of such resources for the addressing of wellness issues. In former(a) countries, thither is simply no technology to produce the necessary recuperates for the large diseases besetting their populations. Whereas in much developed countries with greater storehouse of resources there is a greater capacity to address health hassles, particularly with a more developed technological platform to work from.not only this, just maturation countries have a marked decline in addressing sanitisation concerns thus making for environments more prone to diseases caused by bacteria, worms, and viruses.1 With more healthful living conditions, this is not the observed case in create countries. Thus, a combination of non-hygienic conditions and low access to healthc are creates atmospheres for developing nations making them more prone to experiencing severe health fusss.The first concern regarding health problems in developing countries is the possibility of a disease to develop which is easily transmitted from person to person. The fear of infectious diseases, particularly the fear of such diseases create a pandemic, has had significant impact on the manner in which the spherical community addresses ball-shaped health problems.International agencies have come up with surveillance systems to enable member countries to report incidents of infectious diseases and to better habilitate non-affected nations against contamination.2 The mechanism of report requires member nations to define the nature and extent of transmittance of the disease. This is not particularly attractive to infected nations as the reporting of diseases would adversely affect the economy of the s concern country. With a fear of infection, contrary investors would swall ow their rates of importation. This would serve to lower the economic growth of the said country. Not only this, but tourists would be fearful of visiting said remote country and income from such investments would also decline. The stigma against the affected country would picture to a decline in the status of their economy. It is in this regard that health issues of private nations affect the globose view on health. The slightest change in the ability of individual countries to provide basic resources or to contribute to the worldwide economy would affect all other countries as a proceeds of global interconnectedness.3 The dependence of nations, one to the other, cannot sustain the devolution of takings of goods in any one nation. Apart from moral responsibilities, this is the weightiest disceptation to a global purview on health promotion. The global market favors the ensuring of wealthier nations that less(prenominal) affluent nations pass on be able to participate full y in the global trade of goods. What is not considered in this model are non-infectious diseases plaguing the developing countries around the globe. thither is little incentive for global agencies to address such problems since there is no showing that the same would affect citizens of foreign nations. Although the argument for providing aid for the same due to global trade considerations noneffervescent stands, there is little to no initiative from private do drugs companies. The primary admit of such companies being profit, they are not drawn by the shout for lower prices call for in developing countries.Thus, the trend remains for drug companies to produce drugs and cures that will answer the needs of developed countries whom they can rush higher prices for the products and services they offer. Diseases plaguing impoverished nations such as malaria, AIDS, tuberculosis and the want are given little attention although they may present greater threats than hypertension and car diovascular diseases. This is an unfortunate as developed nations should take it upon themselves to fire health in developing nations as well.The international community would social welfare to a greater extent with the improvement of all component nations. The nations in the international community should not only consider giving aid to developing nations when the diseases may spread into their own localities but take down so when the diseases may be contained domestically. The interest then should not be for global regulation of domestic plagues but it should be for international interest in holistic global health. Although drug companies refuse to focus on respondent the needs of the major diseases in impoverished nations this is not to say that no organized action is being undertaken for the same. Certainly there are individuals and groups who have sex the importance of promoting health on a global scale.The World health Organization, for example has collaborated with larg e pharmaceutical companies in order to bring drugs for the cure of prevalent diseases into levels of access for developing nations.4 The proposed plan is to decrease drug prices for developing nations, if the free delivery of the same is not probable, by increasing prices in affluent countries. Such a scheme would permit the subsidization of drugs by developed countries. There would thus be an equitable division of required resources in order to gain access of available cures in the market.There has also been an observed trend in scientific laboratories. Scientists capable of execute research investigating cures for diseases of poverty have shown greater inclination for the same. backup may be an issue in the matter however, more and more charities are focusing on the aim of global health and blush domestic governments are supporting the bid for finding cures for large health issues.Not only this, but movements have been made to have pharmaceutical companies share the process of production if the matter of marketing drugs at a no-profit price is not possible. Local governments or corporations could then work on producing their own drugs using the process and information shared by foreign corporations. These matters are currently being pushed by advocates worldwide.However, the international community still has much ground to cover. The problem of international health is still a major issue receiving small priority in the global scale. The problem of politicking and bureaucracy hinders advances that could be made in this field. Thus, in order to more aptly answer the problem, local policies should first be reshaped and made to slang the importance of health in the governmental platform. Furthermore, local governments should not recoil themselves to addressing only their own separate needs. Garrett aptly captures the issueTactically, all aspects of stripe and treatment should be part of an integrated effort, drawing from countries finite pools of health t alent to tackle all monsters at once, rather than dueling separately with individual dragons. 5Given limited resources, in the international sense as well as in the domestic, the pooling of these same resources is the best solution to the problem of both global and local health. The vision of individual nations should be intensify to not only address their own problems but they should start to collect the relevance in investing in a global perspective in answering health issues. Certainly, with a view of the same, advances will be made not only for short confines goals of fending off shady diseases in certain nations but more so the long term goal of eradicating debilitating diseases that could potentially reappear in similar conditions or in evolved forms.The answer then is to prepare internationally for the problem of global health as the strengthening of individual platforms in individual nations will address the root issue of recurring conditions. This will serve not only to strengthen the global health system but even other sectors of concern such as trade and global dealings as more and more countries invest in programs reflecting amity and gratuity.BIBILIOGRAPHYCheck, Erika, seek for the Cure, external Policy, (2006) 28-36.Garrett, Laurie, The Challenge of globular Health, Foreign Affairs 86(1), (2007) 14-38.Naim, Moises and Brundtland, Gro Harlem, The FP Interview The Global War for unexclusive Health, Foreign Policy 128, (2002) 24-36.Osterholm, Michael T., Unprepared for a Pandemic, Foreign Affairs 86(2), (2007) 47-57.Zacher, Mark W., Global Epidemiological Surveillance, in Inge Kaw, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc A. Stern, Global Public Goods International Cooperation in the 21st Century (eds.), (1999), NY UNAP.