Canadian Politics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Canadian Politics - audition ExampleThis issue has also appeared in Canada. The pastorals governance has structured in such(prenominal) way that all key decisions are taken by parliament however, actions that are opposed to the countrys parliamentary clay discombobulate non been avoided. At this point, the following dilemma has been set should the baron of the judiciary and the executive in Canada be controlled so that the occasion of the countrys parliamentary system to be adequately protected? It is argued that the limitation of the power of judiciary and executive in Canada would be quite a necessary in order to ensure that democracy in the country is sufficiently promoted. The above personal credit line is justified and appropriately backed by referring to the relevant literature. Particular emphasis is addicted on the power of parties and the judiciary to define the terms on which parliamentary decisions in Canada are based. In the study of Charlton and doggie emphasi s is given on the potential limitation of the society discipline in Canada, so that the independence of the members of the parliament to be increased. Reference is made to two, opposite, views. Kilgour, Kirsner and McConnell, note that party discipline in Canada should be reduced, or even eliminated, since it reduces the power of the members of the parliament to take independently in regard to the issues brought to the parliament for discussion and verification. The party discipline, as applied in the parliamentary system of Canada, means that the members of the parliament have to align their vote with the decisions of their party (Charlton and doggie 2009, p.217), a rule that has caused strong oppositions by the members of the Canadian parliament. Kilgour has been a member of the Canadian parliament since 1979 (Charlton and doggie, 2009, p.217) in 1990 he voted against a bill of his party (Conservatives) in regard to the authorization of Goods and serve Tax (Charlton and Bark er 2009, p.217). As a result of the above decision, he was expelled by his party (Charlton and Barker 2009). Due to the above fact, he decided to join the Liberal Party (Charlton and Barker 2009). In 2005 he decided to continue his career as an independent member of the parliament, especially due to a consider for governmental failures in using appropriately the funds tie in to a sponsorship program in Quebec (Charlton and Barker 2009, p.217). The case of Kilgour shows that party discipline, as currently applied in Canada, prohibits MPs to criticize the decisions of their parties, even if the indications for failures related to party initiatives are many. In other words, party discipline in Canada should be significantly reduced, altogether applied in certain cases, or, if possible, eliminated, allowing the development of opposing views within the parliament. In this way, the quality of democracy in the specific country would be improved (Kilgour, Kirsner and McConnell, in Charlt on and Barker 2009, p.218). In any case, the problem would not be whether the Canadian parliamentary system would become similar with the American Parliamentary system, where the members of the Congress have increased power to state their view (Charlton and Barker 2009, p.218), or not instead, emphasis should be given on the level of democracy in Canada, as reflected in the countrys parliamentary system. At the next level, the following issue should be highlighted in each current form, the party discipline